Interviewer: Doctor, you talked about cancer a little bit, you're certainly an expert in that field. There's so many different tests for different types of cancer out there, screening tests, mammograms, prostate, I mean the list goes on and on. Are those worth it? Is there a benefit to those tests?
Dr. Leonard Coldwell: Absolutely not. Scott, cancer is cancer and the only two ways to define cancer or give it a name, is to name it with a curse, if its a curse on the liver, you have liver cancer. You know? Kidney or skin cancer and so on. Or the way you diagnose it, or basically find out about it in the laboratory setting, the way basically the test is done. You know, the Hodgkin disease, non Hodgkin disease. It only is determined by how you basically find it in the laboratory. So to name it after somebody or after somebody's test, or to name it where it occurs. Cancer is cancer, and cancer is nothing else than the total breakdown of energy.
We are all born with cancer, from the very first moment we are  born we have cancerous potential, potential cancerous cells in our body. So from day one our immune system grabs the mutated atrophied dead, half-dead cells, whatever they are, and just gets rid of it. So now we need to ask ourselves twenty, thirty, forty years later, what in the world happened that changed my energy level to a point that my immune system cannot do its normal function that its used to do, keeping me alive, keeping me clean, keeping me healthy for the last ten, twenty, thirty, forty, fifty, sixty years. Because our immune system is trained for that, used to it, did it all the time. The diagnosis of cancer or the name of your cancer has absolutely no impact on your recovery rate, it has no impact on what treatment you should get, because bylaws ??. A medical doctor in the United States has to apply chemotherapy where there is no surgery, to cancer, to a cancer patient.
So first of all what does it matter what kind of cancer you have or where your cancer is, or how they prognose it or diagnose in the laboratory, if you get the same treatment anyway. If you just step back and use common sense, and say all this testing like mammography has raised the cancer risk at least two percent, at least two percent with heavy mammography, putting fifty pounds of pressure on the most gland loaded tissue in the female body, the breast. Putting fifty pounds of pressure on it. That is absurd, and they're radiating it, its a crime. If you imagine a lymph node, our immune system, our physical immune system is basically our lymph system, and we have four times more lymph liquid than blood, and we basically.. if we really shorten it down to it - our lymph system is our physical immune system. So the lymph nodes, they are collecting the poisons and are like a chemical plant neutralizing the poisons so that the body can eliminate them. Now imagine the same lymph node has so many poisons in it, that it is really like a pimple, you know sometime you look at somebody and there's a pimple on their forehead and you wanna squeeze it. Imagine the lymph node is that poisonous, this inflamed, this infected, ready to burst.
And now you use mammography and you put fifty pounds of pressure on this lymph node, it just bursts. That's how they give you potential breast cancer. Or they have a needle biopsy. People don't understand that the cancer is tumor, it's the approach of the body to save your life. You have so many poisons in your system that these toxins are going to kill you, now the body builds it back and collects all the poisons from your body in this bag and isolates it. Saves your life. The medical profession calls this a tumor. That's why they say 'oh cancer is tumor, always very very toxic in the inside', of course it is because all the toxins from your body are in there. So now imagine you have a balloon, like a regular blow up balloon, filled with water really to its max.
And now you come with a needle or a needle biopsy and you pinch into this balloon. It bursts and all the water runs out and if this case was a needle biopsy, the lymph node or the cancerous tumor bursts and all the toxins are put into the system, and now they're not all over, they're concentrated on one single spot. And now these people have, due to a miracle, very fast growing and a very aggressive cancer, over night. They didn't have that cancer before, they got this cancer that day with a needle biopsy or with a mammography or whatever might be out there. So to answer your question with a long long loop, early detection doesn't statistically doesn't make any sense, it just starts killing you earlier. If you just imagine, breast cancer for example grows for seven to ten years to a size that you can even diagnose it. It grows sever to ten years, lets say a woman is seventy years old, and it grew for ten years to a size, a head of a needle pin. Now it can grow another ten  years to double the size, now the woman is 80-ish, so the average lifespan is what, eighty, eighty three, eighty six, for a woman. So why even start slaughtering this woman, why even bother, because nothing will happen. I don't know if you remember Scott, my own grandmother had a bad lymph node in her breast for 28 years. It didn't grow, it wasn't bad, and then a medical doctor, a young medical doctor talked her into surgery, scared her into surgery, and she started dying for the next three years, the most [inaudible] death I've even seen.
Before 28 years she had this lymph node in her breast, it was cancerous, it didn't grow, it didn't do anything, it didn't hurt nothing. So we need to start using more common sense. If you diagnose a cancer, what do you do with this information? As a medical doctor, chemo, radiation, surgery. So you have skin cancer, what do you do? Chemo, radiation, surgery. You have liver cancer, what do you do? So the approach is always the same. So, early diagnostic and all these different tests, only do one thing- it adds to the one hundred and sixty two billion dollars a year that's early diagnostic and the research community for cancer is swallowing every single year. The cancer industry itself, treatment, is a sixty billion dollar industry. The cancer prevention and early detection is a hundred and sixty two billion dollar industry. And here, Scott, is your answer, the only reason to work for all these early detection techniques, all these early prognostics, all these specific diagnostic techniques, with a ninety year old woman that's why this came up to my hair cutter, cutting the rest of what's left.
She told me that her mom, they said her mom has an open one percent chance there's something wrong with her, and they want to do all this testing, this woman is ninety years old, they wanna do all this testing to make sure there's nothing wrong. It's laughable, its a joke,  and even if they find it, what do they do then? Now they do chemo, radiation and surgery on a ninety year old woman? It is just ridiculous. To conclude that answer, the early detection methods are only created to make earlier customers so that they can treat the cancer patient longer because statistics show, if you treat a cancer patient with chemo, radiation and surgery, they might live seventeen days longer than people that are not treated. But the people that are not treated with that, they have quality of life, they still have their hair, they still look good, but the second you get into the medical treatment- you lose your hair, your fingernails, your teeth rot out, you turn blind, you die early and there's no quality of life to begin with anymore.
On the other hand, there are four hundred known natural cancer cures out there, so why even consider a medical doctor, and I just remembered because I said it yesterday at my speech, National Geographic conducted a study with a hundred year old people, and not people that were dying, people that were a hundred year old and were vital and fit and have a high quality of life. And the absolute only thing they had in common, not diet, not exercise, not nothing, the absolute only thing they had in common was - they never went to a doctor. You know, if they broke their leg or something it's a different story, accidents, but they all never went to a doctor, and that I think is very, very significant.